Skip to content

Day 54: Nsight Compute – Kernel Analysis

字数
1469 字
阅读时间
10 分钟

Objective:
Use Nsight Compute for in-depth kernel analysis, focusing on occupancy, memory throughput, instruction mix, and bottleneck identification. Nsight Compute is NVIDIA’s low-level profiler that provides detailed metrics (e.g., SM utilization, warp stall reasons, memory bandwidth usage, and instruction throughput). By examining both memory and compute metrics, you can form a complete optimization approach—ignoring memory-related data risks missing crucial bottlenecks.

Key Reference:


Table of Contents

  1. Overview
  2. Why Use Nsight Compute?
  3. Installation & Basic Workflow
  4. Practical Example: Analyzing a Kernel
  5. Key Metrics: Occupancy, Memory Throughput, Instruction Mix
  6. Mermaid Diagrams
  7. Common Pitfalls & Best Practices
  8. References & Further Reading
  9. Conclusion
  10. Next Steps

1. Overview

Nsight Compute is a powerful profiler that captures detailed metrics about each GPU kernel execution, letting you identify:

  • Occupancy (active warps vs. potential).
  • Memory usage (global load/store efficiency, L2 usage).
  • Instruction categories (integer, floating, SFU usage).
  • Warp stall reasons (like Long Scoreboard, Mem Dependency, PipeBusy).

This helps pinpoint whether a kernel is memory-bound or compute-bound, or if it has warp divergence or low occupancy. By analyzing these metrics, you can apply targeted optimizations rather than guesswork.


2. Why Use Nsight Compute?

  1. Detailed GPU Performance Metrics
    • More granular than Nsight Systems’ timeline. You see per-kernel data on instruction throughput, memory bandwidth, warp stalls.
  2. Comparisons
    • Compare multiple runs or multiple kernels. Track changes after code modifications or different compiler flags.
  3. Visual or CLI** Options**
    • Nsight Compute has a GUI (ncurses-like or separate visual) or CLI mode (ncu) for script-based analysis.
  4. Bottleneck Identification
    • Distinguish if memory or compute is the limiting factor. Evaluate occupancy vs. actual performance.

But: Overemphasis on a single metric (like occupancy or instructions) can be misleading if you ignore memory. A kernel might show high occupancy but remain memory-bound, or vice versa.


3. Installation & Basic Workflow

  • Install Nsight Compute as part of the CUDA Toolkit or separate package.
  • Run your application with ncu --target-processes all ./myApp or open the Nsight Compute GUI.
  • Select which kernels to profile if multiple.
  • Collect metrics: The tool can gather a broad range of info, but a smaller subset (like --metrics all or a specific set) might be more manageable.

Pro Tip: Avoid collecting every possible metric in one run, as overhead can be huge. Start with a “Speed of Light” analysis or “Memory Workload Analysis” section.


4. Practical Example: Analyzing a Kernel

a) Code Snippet & Explanation

cpp
/**** day54_nSightComputeExample.cu ****/
#include <cuda_runtime.h>
#include <stdio.h>

__global__ void sumArrays(const float *A, const float *B, float *C, int N){
    int idx= blockIdx.x*blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
    if(idx < N){
        // intentionally do multiple loads to see memory usage
        float valA = A[idx];
        float valB = B[idx];
        // a small loop
        #pragma unroll
        for(int i=0;i<4;i++){
            // some extra ops
            valA *= 1.0001f; 
            valB += 0.5f;
        }
        C[idx] = valA + valB;
    }
}

int main(){
    int N=1<<20;
    size_t size= N*sizeof(float);
    float *h_A=(float*)malloc(size);
    float *h_B=(float*)malloc(size);
    float *h_C=(float*)malloc(size);

    for(int i=0;i<N;i++){
        h_A[i]= (float)(rand()%100);
        h_B[i]= (float)(rand()%100);
    }

    float *d_A,*d_B,*d_C;
    cudaMalloc(&d_A,size);
    cudaMalloc(&d_B,size);
    cudaMalloc(&d_C,size);

    cudaMemcpy(d_A, h_A, size,cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);
    cudaMemcpy(d_B, h_B, size,cudaMemcpyHostToDevice);

    dim3 block(256);
    dim3 grid( (N+block.x-1)/block.x );
    sumArrays<<<grid, block>>>(d_A,d_B,d_C,N);
    cudaDeviceSynchronize();

    cudaMemcpy(h_C, d_C, size, cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost);
    printf("h_C[0]=%f\n", h_C[0]);

    cudaFree(d_A); cudaFree(d_B); cudaFree(d_C);
    free(h_A); free(h_B); free(h_C);
    return 0;
}

Explanation:

  • We create a simple kernel that sums arrays A and B but also does extra ops in a small loop to produce a few instructions.
  • This kernel might be memory-bound for large N, but we have some compute instructions to show a mixed usage.
  • We then use Nsight Compute to gather metrics.

b) Profiling Steps with Nsight Compute

  1. Compile:
    bash
    nvcc -O3 day54_nSightComputeExample.cu -o day54
  2. Profile with CLI:
    bash
    ncu --target-processes all ./day54
    Nsight Compute will run your app, capture data on sumArrays kernel.
  3. Open the interactive Nsight Compute UI or the generated report.
  4. Metrics to consider:
    • Occupancy
    • Memory throughput (L2 transaction rate, DRAM utilization)
    • Instruction mix: integer vs. floating vs. SFU
    • Warp stall reasons: e.g., “Long Scoreboard” => memory latency.
  5. Interpret results. If DRAM utilization is high and stalls revolve around memory, it’s memory-bound. If you see high registers usage but moderate memory traffic, you might consider register-limiting or unrolling changes.

5. Key Metrics: Occupancy, Memory Throughput, Instruction Mix

a) Occupancy

  • Shows the ratio of active warps to the maximum possible.
  • High occupancy can help hide latency, but if memory-bound, simply increasing occupancy might not fix your performance issue.

b) Memory Throughput

  • Global Load/Store: Check if you are near the GPU’s theoretical memory bandwidth.
  • Cache Hit Rates: If your code is missing in L1 or L2 frequently, you might see high latency stalls. Possibly reorganizing data for better coalescing or caching helps.

c) Instruction Mix & Warp Stall Reasons

  • FADD, FMUL, FFMA: Are you performing fused ops or repeated adds?
  • Warp stalls: “Mem dependency,” “Pipe busy,” “Warp wait” can reveal if you’re waiting for memory or if execution pipelines are saturated.

Ignoring memory metrics leads to an “incomplete optimization approach”—you might see a certain instruction throughput but fail to realize your kernel is predominantly waiting on memory.


6. Mermaid Diagrams

Diagram 1: Nsight Compute Profiling Flow

mermaid
flowchart TD
    A[Compile kernel: day54.cu] --> B[Run with ncu or Nsight Compute UI]
    B --> C[Collect metrics: occupancy, memory, instructions]
    C --> D[Analyze results => identify memory-bound or compute-bound]
    D --> E[Refine code or data usage => re-compile]
    E --> B[Iterate]

Explanation:
We see an iterative loop: code changes, re-profile, interpret metrics, refine again.

Diagram 2: Occupancy & Memory Coalescing Observations

mermaid
flowchart LR
    subgraph Observed Data
    direction TB
    O1[Occupancy e.g. 75%]
    O2[Memory throughput e.g. 80% of peak]
    O3[Stall reasons e.g. mem dependency]
    end
    subgraph Optimization
    A[If memory-bound => improve coalescing / reduce traffic]
    B[If compute-bound => unroll loops or reduce register usage]
    end

    Observed Data --> Optimization

7. Common Pitfalls & Best Practices

  1. Collecting Too Many Metrics
    • Nsight Compute overhead can be huge if you gather every possible metric in one pass. Start with a smaller “speed-of-light” section or a memory analysis preset.
  2. Interpreting One Metric in Isolation
    • Occupancy alone doesn’t guarantee performance. Memory metrics or warp stalls matter equally.
  3. Kernel Selection
    • If your application has multiple kernels, focus on the biggest time-consuming kernel first.
  4. Inconsistent Runs
    • Ensure you run in a stable environment with consistent GPU frequency or use ncu -m multiple passes to average results.

8. References & Further Reading

  1. Nsight Compute Docs
    Nsight Compute Official Documentation
  2. NVIDIA Developer Blog
    • Articles on using Nsight Compute effectively, advanced profiling case studies.
  3. CUDA C Best Practices Guide – “Profiling & Optimization”
    Docs Link

9. Conclusion

Day 54: Nsight Compute for Kernel Analysis:

  • We emphasized advanced metrics like occupancy, memory throughput, and instruction mix.
  • Showed how ignoring memory metrics can lead to incomplete conclusions about your kernel’s real bottleneck.
  • Provided a small kernel example (sumArrays) and how to run Nsight Compute to gather info.
  • Interpreting results carefully is critical: if the kernel is memory-bound, unrolling or rewriting instructions might do little. If it’s compute-bound, analyzing warp stalls or instruction throughput can guide you to beneficial changes.

Key Takeaway:
Nsight Compute offers deep kernel insights to drive targeted optimization—both memory and compute metrics are essential to form a complete picture of where your kernel stands. By methodically analyzing occupancy, memory usage, warp stalls, and instruction throughput, you can zero in on the real limiting factor and apply the right optimization strategy.


10. Next Steps

  1. Profile a real HPC or ML kernel in your code with Nsight Compute to see whether it’s memory-bound or compute-bound.
  2. Focus on the top metrics: occupancy, warp stall reasons, memory throughput, L2 transactions.
  3. Experiment with code changes—like different block sizes or loop unrolling—then re-check Nsight Compute metrics to see if you overcame the previous bottleneck.
  4. Integrate with concurrency: if you use multiple streams, check if any concurrency overhead or partial GPU usage is visible in the timeline or concurrency metrics.
  5. Combine with higher-level improvements from days 52–53 (like unrolling, register usage tweaks, or PTX analysis) only if you see a compute-limited scenario.


## 贡献者

<NolebaseGitContributors />


## 文件历史

<NolebaseGitChangelog />

撰写